Generally, the impedance analyzer measures the complex electrical impedance as a function of the test frequency. It also measures the opposition of current in alternating current systems and body impedance with small electrodes.
Easy Navigation
Measures opposition to current in alternating current systems
Generally, when we talk about opposition to current in alternating current systems, we are talking about the opposition between the current and the inductor. This opposition is referred to as reactance. Unlike resistance, reactance is a force that is directly proportional to the component inductance. It is measured in ohms.
If we want to understand the opposition to current in alternating current systems, we need to understand the relationship between reactance, resistance and impedance. These three components have to be measured and calculated together. In order to find out how much impedance is needed to oppose the current in a circuit, we must first calculate the inductive reactance.
Measures magnitude and phase of an electrical one-port network
Using a vector network analyzer to measure magnitude and phase of an electrical one-port network is a surefire way to identify errors and improve test performance. Most SNAs measure only the one, but a few of the newer models can measure both magnitude and phase simultaneously. As you can imagine, the one-port model is more cost effective, which is a boon to test engineers and managers. However, there is more to an SNA than meets the eye.
Using a vector network analyzer to perform a magnitude and phase measurement is a simple exercise, but one that requires a bit of experimentation to come up with a working set. To do this, the first step is to set up the test. This involves a 50-ohm current source, which is used to supply a +-20 mA bias for each port. Once this is done, the next step is to determine which of the ports is the one to measure. After all, it is one thing to measure the input impedance of a port, and it is another to measure the output phase of a port.
Measures body impedance with small electrodes
Using small electrodes to measure body impedance is an effective technique to estimate body composition. It also allows the distinction of body fat from other body tissues. Body fat conducts electricity less effectively than skin. The amount of body fat is then subtracted from the total body weight. This technique is widely used by clinical doctors to determine nutritional status.
In the present study, we assessed the accuracy of the body fat algorithm using a wrist-wearable bioelectrical impedance analyzer. Three different ECG electrodes were used with a reference electrode to measure the body’s impedance. The accuracy was assessed using a correlation plot and a Bland-Altman plot.
Accuracy
Using an impedance analyzer is an important tool in the measurement of complex electrical impedance as a function of frequency. Accurate measurements are essential for accurate black-box modeling of electrical equipment.
To achieve accurate impedance measurements, compensation methods have been proposed to remove the effects of test leads. A typical compensation method uses a transmission line model of test leads to represent the spatial arrangement of the test leads. This method substracts the shunt admittance of the test lead from diagonal elements of the measured admittance matrix.
Although this method is effective at removing the effects of test leads, its application to measuring impedance of large electrical equipment is limited. In addition, the results of the proposed method vary with the frequency band of interest.
Dynamic range
Whether you’re an engineer or a consumer, understanding the dynamic range of an impedance analyzer can help you save time and money on your next project. It can also help you improve your test margins.
The dynamic range of an impedance analyzer is a combination of the noise floor of the instrument and the distortion performance of its measurement hardware. This combination is used to determine the signal to noise ratio of a component. The noise floor is measured in decibels while the distortion product is measured in dBc.
An ideal mixer input level maximizes the dynamic range of the instrument. The ideal level is at the intersection of the noise floor and third order distortion trace.